Orest Deychakiwsky Columns in "Ukrainian Weekly" newspaper |
The Ukrainian Weekly
America’s solidarity with Ukraine
by Orest Deychakiwsky
Last March, just a few weeks after Russia’s brutal
full-scale invasion began, I went to Dulles International Airport to pick up
the wife and children of a Ukrainian official who had sent them to safety in
the early days of the war. As we were driving back to my home in Charles Town,
W.Va., the kids cried out “Mama, look at all the Ukrainian flags!” Indeed, the
entire half-mile stretch of the nearby rural town of Hillsboro, Va., with its
population of fewer than 150 people, was covered with blue and yellow flags and
“Stand with Ukraine” signs and banners.
But this was not the end. The following month, in
April 2022, Hillsboro’s UkraineAid concert and art auction raised $20,000 to
support war refugees. Just last month, in February, the town held an “Art of
War” auction to raise money for Ukraine, featuring a Swedish award-winning
political cartoonist and an internationally-known blacksmith from
Ivano-Frankivsk, Ukraine.
Throughout the past year, and especially in the
initial months following the invasion, I have seen various expressions of
support in Charles Town, W.Va. There’s a coffee shop that closed for two weeks
last summer because the owners – as part of a mission by the local Baptist
church – went to Romania to aid Ukrainian refugees. And there’s the local
gentleman who on a nearly daily basis for months on end has been displaying
pro-Ukraine signs and collecting donations for United Nations programs that
have been providing help to Ukraine.
There were fundraisers in the nearby town of
Shepherdstown, W.Va., and Ukrainian flags waving in the center of historic
Harpers Ferry, W.Va., among other displays of solidarity.
Mind you, these places have no apparent connections
with Ukraine and only a handful of Ukrainian Americans reside there. In her
recent remarks at the Munich Security Conference, Vice President Kamala Harris
noted: “I will tell you, I travel around the United States, and I have seen the
Ukrainian flag fly in places most of you have probably never heard of in the
United States: in storefronts, in front of homes, Americans proudly wearing the
colors of Ukraine.” There have been thousands of protests, petitions,
fundraisers and concerts across the country.
This support has come from not only ordinary
Americans (which is especially heartening), but also from the more influential
and well-known members of American society: actors, artists, musicians, sports
figures, as well as experts, thought leaders and activists.
Also, Ukrainian-Americans, often working with other
fellow Americans, have been amazing in stepping up as never before to help
their ancestral homeland in its time of great need.
The media has done a commendable job informing
Americans about the war and, indeed, about Ukraine. CNN, PBS, NPR, The New York
Times and The Washington Post, among others, have provided especially in-depth
and compelling on-the-ground coverage. In addition to the many reports on
day-to-day developments as well as solid analysis and commentary, we have seen
powerful accounts of the impact of the war on Ukrainian society. There have
been many moving stories about ordinary Ukrainians – what they have endured and
how they are coping.
Naturally, the coverage has ebbed and flowed
depending on developments and is not, for the most part, as intense as in the
early months of the war. During the week leading up to the war’s one-year
anniversary, coverage spiked, with several outstanding specials on CNN and
MSNBC. On two Sundays in a row, CBS’ iconic “60 Minutes” led off with stories
from Ukraine. Social media coverage of the war also has been as intensive as it
has been profuse.
American policymakers and the foreign policy
establishment, with relatively few exceptions, are committed to standing with
Ukraine “as long as it takes.” U.S. government assistance is unprecedented.
President Joe Biden’s recent surprise visit to Kyiv – the first in modern
history by a U.S. president to a war zone without the protection of the U.S.
military – is exhibit number 1. Within the executive branch, the debate is not
whether to support Ukraine – that’s a given. Rather, it is between those who
are more cautious in their approach and those who are more forward-leaning.
A substantial majority of both chambers in Congress
remain committed to doing what they can to help Ukraine win. This is
notwithstanding questions about funding levels for American assistance that has
been sent for the war effort and accountability regarding its disbursement
(which, thus far, thankfully, has not been a problem), as well as some
frustration that our European allies are not shouldering more of the burden.
And while one should not underestimate – and must combat – those who wish to
cut aid, most Democrats and Republicans are dedicated to trying to help Ukraine
win.
In the Senate, both Majority Leader Chuck Schumer and
Republican leader Mitch McConnell are stalwart supporters of Ukraine, as are
the majority in both their caucuses.
In the House, you have the extremist MAGA-wing – they
are a noisy, shortsighted and rather incoherent minority who recently
introduced the Ukraine Fatigue Resolution, which I doubt will get any serious
traction. As in other policy arenas, we see a fissure within the Republican
party – between the isolationists who want to diminish support for Ukraine and
the internationalists – some of whom are critical of the administration for not
providing additional military aid more rapidly. Importantly – and this matters
a lot – Republican chairmen of key House committees, such as Foreign Affairs,
Intelligence and Armed Services, are all staunchly committed to Ukraine’s
success.
And yet, despite these amazing expressions of
concrete and moral support in the year since the launch of Russia’s
full-fledged invasion, opinion polls show a softening of support for arming
Ukraine in comparison to the early months of the war. Not surprisingly, much of
the opposition comes from the pro-Trump wing of the Republican party.
How worried should we be about this relatively modest
decline in support? I believe that there is cause for concern, but not alarm.
There is still a deep reservoir of support – a critical mass – among the
American people and their elected representatives.
Why do I think most Americans will continue to
support Ukraine?
First, most Americans love an underdog. Many are in
awe of a people defending their freedom. It’s not unusual to hear the word
“amazing” to describe the courage, resilience and ingenuity of the Ukrainian
people. In more than one casual conversation, I’ve heard folks wonder how we
Americans would compare with Ukrainians in similar circumstances.
Second, many Americans understand the geopolitical
and strategic ramifications of this war. They understand that brute, unprovoked
aggression and annexation of another country’s territory must not be rewarded
and that the principles of territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence
greatly matter to peace, security and the rules-based international order. They
understand that standing shoulder to shoulder with Ukraine and providing
necessary military and financial assistance serves and furthers our own vital
national interests.
But there is more to it than that. Many Americans who
are not especially attuned to the geopolitical dimension support Ukraine
because it is the right thing to do – it is about the core values of democracy,
freedom and human dignity. They are shocked and horrified by what they see and
read, the massive atrocities committed by Russian forces, in what has become
the most documented war in history. The solidarity that we have seen over the
last year is perhaps a reflection, first and foremost, of the fundamental
decency, generosity and goodwill of the American people.
Call me naive, but I am confident that, despite some
headwinds and countervailing pressures, most Americans have lost neither their
moral compass nor their common sense. They will continue to stand in solidarity
with the Ukrainian people as long as it takes. And places like Hillsboro, Va.,
give me that hope.
The Ukrainian Weekly
Making the Case for Ukraine with Congress
January 13 2023
by Orest Deychakiwsky
Throughout my 35 years on Capitol Hill working at the
Helsinki Commission (1981-2017) I was no stranger to the Capitol itself. But
never have I been more thrilled to be in that hallowed building than for
President Volodymyr Zelenskyy’s December 21 address to a joint session of
Congress. This was truly an historic moment that will be long remembered as few
other Congressional appearances by foreign leaders have been. Not incorrectly,
it has been compared to Winston Churchill’s December 1941 wartime address to
Congress.
The Ukrainian president’s remarks were powerful,
convincing and enthusiastically received by the overwhelming majority of those
present in the chamber.
Ukrainians themselves, starting with Mr. Zelenskyy,
have been making a compelling case for why Washington needs to sustain Ukraine
in its fight for freedom. His wife, Olena, made a terrific impression when she
spoke to members of Congress last July. The numerous visitors to Congress from
Ukraine, both high-ranking officials and representatives of civil society, have
been effective spokespersons for Ukraine. The Ukrainian Embassy, under the
leadership of Ambassador Oksana Markarova, herself a force of nature, and her
seasoned Deputy Chief of Mission Yaroslav Brisiuck, has played an instrumental
role in garnering support for Ukraine.
So, does that mean we Americans, especially Ukrainian
Americans, can kick back and relax? Not by a long shot. Indeed, since Russia’s
full-fledged invasion began, we have seen an expansion in advocacy efforts the
likes of which I have not seen in my more than four decades of involvement with
Ukraine in the nation’s capital. But more on that later.
Ukraine has enjoyed bipartisan Congressional support
for more than a century and it is no surprise that it has taken on far greater
importance since Russia’s full-fledged invasion. The most visible manifestation
of Congress’ commitment has been the more than $100 billion in emergency
funding appropriated for Ukraine-related assistance since February 24, 2022. It
has come in four separate packages, the most recent being an appropriation of
$45 billion announced the week of Mr. Zelenskyy’s address. Any way you slice
it, this is an enormous amount of money.
Appropriating badly needed military and financial
assistance has been far from the only Congressional action on behalf of
Ukraine. Several other bills and resolutions passed in 2022 that also provided
important backing for Ukraine, among them the Ukraine Democracy Defense
Lend-Lease Act of 2022 and the National Defense Authorization Act for fiscal
year 2023 (NDAA). There have been many other Congressional initiatives in the
last year – hearings, briefings, statements, press releases, visits by members
and staff to Ukraine itself (often logistically challenging), countless
meetings and briefings with the Ukrainian Embassy and visiting Ukrainian
officials and civil society representatives. I am especially proud of the work
of the Helsinki Commission, which has been incredibly active on Ukraine in the
last year.
Congressional support has been crucial in enhancing
Ukraine’s ability to fend off Russian aggression and often in encouraging the
administration to be more proactive. A substantial majority of Senators and
Representatives understand that Ukraine’s fight is our fight, that it is the
fight of the entire free and civilized world. Moreover, this Congressional
activity and assistance reflect the will of the American people who continue to
stand with Ukraine.
It is also bolstered by vigorous advocacy efforts by
Ukraine’s many friends in this country, including of course the Ukrainian
American community.
The history of advocacy on behalf of Ukraine is a
long and storied one and it has evolved over time. Before independence, it was
almost exclusively Ukrainian Americans lobbying on behalf of Ukraine. The
landscape changed radically post-independence, with the engagement of numerous
influential non-Ukrainian American voices. In fact, in comparison to the pre-
and immediate post-independence period, advocacy by Ukrainian Americans waned
somewhat for many years.
However, starting in 2014, and especially since
February 24, 2022, diaspora advocacy has come back in full force.
Since the closure of the Ukrainian National
Association office in Washington, D.C., back in 1995, the only Ukrainian
American office devoted largely to advocacy in the nation’s capital had been
the Ukrainian Congress Committee of America’s (UCCA) Ukrainian National
Information Service (UNIS). It has done important advocacy work consistently
since 1977, albeit with limited staff. Opportunely, the Washington Ukrainian
American advocacy scene has now been greatly enhanced with a new, well-staffed
Razom office, consisting largely of young professionals.
As welcome as the presence of two Washington
Ukrainian American advocacy offices who prudently often collaborate is, the
engagement of all Ukrainian Americans as well as Ukraine’s innumerable other
American backers remains essential. Here’s a suggestion for 2023: Sign up to
join Razom’s advocacy network, which will include updates with actions you can
undertake to reach out to your Senators and Representative. You can do so at
this website: https://bit.ly/razom-advocacy. To get regular updates from UNIS,
which has long informed grassroots activists through its action alerts, contact
the office by email at unis.sawkiw@gmail.com. I recommend doing both.
Despite the successes with respect to Congressional
support in 2022, there is still plenty of work ahead in what will be a pivotal
year. Advocates need to keep pressing for Congress to provide the requisite
concrete military and financial assistance that Ukraine needs. Congress can
play a vital role not only in funding military aid but in encouraging the
administration to furnish more advanced weaponry to the country. Financial aid
is also an absolute necessity given the 30 percent decline in Ukraine’s economy
in 2022. Beyond assistance, there will be initiatives dealing with sanctions
and various other measures to hold the Russians accountable for their
aggression and genocidal actions.
As compelling as both the strategic and moral case
for supporting Ukraine is, one must not take anything for granted. Keep in mind
that even the most favorably disposed members of Congress must deal with a
plethora of issues, both foreign and domestic. The dysfunction among House
Republicans, as illustrated by the chaos over the election of the Speaker of
the House, may also in some ways complicate funding levels for Ukraine.
Advocates will need to keep Ukraine on Congress’ radar screen and keep
reminding the American public of the stakes involved. It is incumbent upon each
of us to do what we can.
U.S. midterm elections and support for Ukraine
DECEMBER 02, 2022 9:26 AM
by Orest Deychakiwsky
The results of the midterm competition for control of
the U.S. House and Senate are in and President Joe Biden believes that the
basic bipartisan consensus to support Ukraine will hold. I think he is right.
But we should take nothing for granted and recognize that there will be
challenges ahead. Ukrainian Americans and Ukraine’s many other friends will
need to keep up their advocacy efforts for a long time to come, particularly in
the coming weeks.
Given historical precedent, most experts predicted
that Democrats would get clobbered, especially given high inflation. But the
anticipated midterm Republican Red Wave did not materialize. However, even
though the pro-Trump, MAGA candidates underperformed, they will still be enough
of a force to complicate support for Ukraine.
The narrowly-controlled Republican House will likely
be more problematic than the U.S. Senate, which remains under Democratic
control, albeit barely.
The vast majority of Democrats in both the Senate and
the House, even those who signed the October House Progressives’ unfortunate
letter which they hastily retracted, continue to back Ukraine. So do most
Republicans, including those most likely to assume chairmanships on relevant
House committees.
On the Senate side, the Republican leadership, along
with top Republicans on key committees such as the Senate Foreign Relations and
Armed Services committees remain staunch advocates of Ukraine. They and most of
their Republican colleagues in both chambers constitute what I would call the
internationalist/national security/neo-Reaganite wing of the party. They
understand that Ukraine winning the war is the central foreign policy issue of
our time.
The chief problem lies in the MAGA and
neo-isolationist wing of the Republican Party, fueled and abetted by the likes
of Donald Trump, certain Fox News television talk show hosts, and some
conservative groups and think tanks with longstanding ties to the Republican
party – sadly, the Heritage Foundation is among them. They will cause problems,
but they will not succeed in stopping aid altogether – or even cutting it
dramatically. After all, in addition to the pro-Ukrainian majorities in
Congress, there is also still a reservoir of deep support among the American
public.
Rather, the fight in Congress will be over
maintaining the high levels of funding we have seen thus far, especially the
desperately needed financial assistance to help keep the Ukrainian economy stay
afloat. Many in both parties think that our allies and partners – especially
those in the European Union – could be doing more to help Ukraine. While they
have a point, it is also the case that just because others should be doing more
does not mean we should be doing less.
There are many reasons why assisting Ukraine is in
our national security interest. Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin put it
succinctly at the recent Halifax International Security Forum: “The outcome of
the war in Ukraine will help determine the global security of this young
century, and those of us in North America don’t have the option of sitting this
one out. Stability and security on both sides of the Atlantic are at stake.”
Helping Ukraine maximally should be a no-brainer.
This is no time for isolationism. The $66 billion
appropriated by Congress for Ukraine-related aid since February 24 is
doubtlessly a lot of money. On November 15, Mr. Biden asked for an additional
$37.7 billion in emergency funding. The current Congress may exceed this
amount, as it has done with earlier requests. But even these generous
allotments would be dwarfed by the costs the United States would incur with an
undefeated, and hence, sooner or later, emboldened Russia. A Ukrainian win
would also send a powerful signal to an increasingly aggressive China. For
these and other reasons, assistance for Ukraine is an excellent return on the
U.S. investment – indeed, it’s a bargain. Fiscally conservative Republicans in
Congress – many of whom are sympathetic to Ukraine – should be mindful of this.
Now is not the time to be penny-wise and pound-foolish.
Helping Ukraine is not only in our national
interests, but it is deeply consistent with our values. The United States has a
moral imperative to help a country experiencing genocide – yes, genocide – at
the hands of a brutal, heartless aggressor. The continuing missile attacks
designed to make Ukrainians suffer as much as possible this winter and that
continue to kill innocent civilians, including babies at maternity wards,
starkly demonstrate that the Kremlin is devoid of conscience. Metropolitan
Archbishop Borys Gudziak, the leader of the Ukrainian Catholic Church in the
United States, summed it up well at a recent gathering of U.S. Catholic
bishops: “The American people broadly support American aid to Ukraine because
they understand it’s in America’s best interest. They also see the virtue of
the Ukrainian position: it’s a position of peace, of democracy, of freedom;
it’s a position that is inspired by faith.” Something to mull over especially
as we approach the Christmas season.
Given the uncertainties that lie ahead in the next
(118th) Congress, the current Congress should do everything possible during the
lame-duck session to appropriate military and non-military assistance for
Ukraine so that the country is guaranteed funding for the coming months.
Encouraging are reports that at least some leading Congressional Republicans,
along with their Democratic colleagues, are ready to allocate more than the $37
billion request as part of the end-of-the-year omnibus funding bill, especially
if it includes additional oversight measures.
Ideally, Congress will pass a generous Ukraine
emergency aid package this month as part of a full government spending bill.
This would be preferable to another temporary spending bill (continuing
resolution) which would kick the can down the road to the next Congress with
its unpredictability, particularly in the House. Ukraine needs and more than
deserves fulsome appropriations for what is, after all, our fight as well. We
must never forget that in defending their homeland the Ukrainian people are
protecting freedom, democracy and the rules-based international order. In
short, they are defending the civilized world.
A letter to Vova (Vladimir Putin)
by Orest Deychakiwsky
Dear Vova,
I take the liberty of writing you an informal,
somewhat stream-of-consciousness letter to let you know just what I think of
you, and to suggest to you that your ugly war against Ukraine is not going too
well, to put it mildly. But I suspect you already know that.
I am an American of Ukrainian heritage and, of
course, Americans and Ukrainians are the two peoples you despise more than any
other. For 35 years, I worked for a U.S. government agency – the Commission on
Security and Cooperation in Europe, better known as the Helsinki Commission.
Yes, yes, the same Commission that has been a thorn in Moscow’s side going back
to Soviet times. In May, your Foreign Affairs Ministry included some current
and many former commissioners and staff on a list of 963 Americans permanently
banned from Russia, including myself. You really let us have it! But that’s OK,
Vova. Somehow we’ll manage to get by.
On a more serious note, Moscow has never much cared
for the Helsinki Commission. Ever since its creation following the signing of
the 1975 Helsinki Final Act, the Commission has attempted to hold the Kremlin
accountable for its repeated violations of its Organization for Security and
Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) human rights and security commitments. With the
war on Ukraine, Russia’s already poor record of compliance has only further
deteriorated, as Moscow shamelessly and grossly flouts all 10 founding
principles ensh-rined in the Helsinki Final Act – every single one! – not to
mention the United Nations Charter, the Geneva Convention and numerous other
international agreements.
Vova, I would not wish to be in your shoes right now.
Everybody is fed up with you. I hate to tell you this (well, not really) but
you are in a bind and your situation is precarious. You have nobody to blame
except your narcissistic, arrogant self.
The Ukrainians (or whatever you might call them as
they don’t really exist in your twisted mind) not only have not succumbed to
your perverse desires, but they have also been winning on the battlefield. Big
time! And despite your ineffectual propaganda, which few people believe anymore
because it has gone beyond the limits of the absurd (calling Ukrainians Nazis –
really?!?), the brave and resourceful Ukrainians have won the hearts and minds
of people around the world. Notably, as you have come to see much to your
chagrin, this includes the U.S. government, Congress and the American public.
It also includes – perhaps even more to your
displeasure as you did not expect this – Europe and other democratic allies and
partners around the world. They are working with America to provide
unprecedented military, economic and humanitarian aid to the nation that you
wish to erase. We and our international partners are punishing you with massive
sanctions. And you can bet that the free world will continue to support the
Ukrainian people.
Let’s face it, Vova, you have no friends. Your so-so
buddies, the Chinese and the neutral Indians, are increasingly unhappy with you
and are pushing you to end the war. Other non-aligned countries are less than
pleased as well. The recent U.N. General Assembly annual session showed just
how isolated you are. Even Belarus was half-hearted in its support, and I think
you well realize that your lapdog Bela-rusian President Alyaksandr Lukashenka
prefers not to be involved, in part fearing his own people, with whom he is
already unpopular and who do not want any part of your, ahem, “special military
operation.”
The bottom line, Vovochka, is that the world realizes
yours is a needless war of choice, completely unprovoked and unjustified. There
is a wonderful saying, attributed to our great American President Abraham
Lincoln (a man whom, I’m afraid, was the polar opposite of you; to whom you
cannot even begin to hold a candle): “You can fool all of the people some of
the time and some of the people all of the time, but you can’t fool all of the
people all of the time.” Yes, there are a few shortsighted or willfully blind
individuals who still believe that your invasion was due to North Atlantic
Treaty Organization (NATO) expan-sion, but most people know the score.
The real reason for your brutal aggression, and I am
quite surprised in how open you have been in asserting this, including in your
infamous 2021 pseudo-essay, is your desire to wipe out Ukraine as a state and
Ukrainians as a people. But your genocidal campaign – the war crimes, the
atrocities, the killings, the torture, the sexual violence, the forced
deportations, the filtration camps, the separation of parents and children, the
destruction of homes and civilian infrastructure – is ultimately an exercise in
futility. Why? I repeat, to try to get it through your thick skull, because of
the incredible courage and resilience of the Ukrainian people defending their
homeland. Also, because of the support they enjoy from the democratic West in
particular, and the broader civilized world that respects the rules-based
international order. Yes, Vova, the international order that you have violated
with impunity.
It’s become increasing obvious over the two plus
decades of your misrule that you are the face of evil (You may take that as a
compliment, but hey, that’s your prerogative). You showed that early on in your
rule when your FSB (security service) bombed apartment buildings killing
hundreds as a pretext for the second Chechen War. It’s only gone from bad to
worse. You have become even more despicable since February 24. You have caused
so much death, destruction and suffering. I know empathy and humanity are not
your strong suites, but I didn’t realize that you could be as cruel, callous
and depraved as you have shown yourself to be. You think that you are strong?
The only thing you are showing is your weakness.
However, I must confess that I never considered you
to be stupid. I thought that you were basically a rational actor – evil, but
not stupid. Boy was I wrong, as your actions are not those of a sane human
being (And please don’t tell me that it was due to the bad information from
your sycophantic advisors – that doesn’t cut it). Polite people call your
full-fledged attack on Ukraine a “strategic miscalculation.”
I call it a senseless blunder of epic proportions.
Your actions, Vova, are those of a corrupt tyrant
with imperial delusions and a pathological obsession with a country you deem
essential to the restoration of your perverse vision of some sort of a “great
Russia.” You fancy yourself a Peter the Great. Instead, you will be remembered
and cursed for all eternity by your own people for having weakened and possibly
even destroyed Russia. You will have achieved the exact opposite of what you
wanted. What can I say, Vova, you are a buffoon, a moron, a fool for the ages,
and an evil one at that!
You should not be in the least surprised, Vovochka,
that you are the most resented, hated man in the entire world. You are even
blowing it with your own population, which has been relatively passively
supportive until very recently. You were able to fool many with your relentless
disinformation campaigns and appeal to the unhealthy, imperialistic,
chauvinistic instincts of all too many – though by no means all – Russians. But
those days appear to be over. With your “partial mobilization,” your subjects
are running for the hills – with planes and cars full of men getting the hell
out of Dodge, as we would say here in the States. Your national minorities are
over-represented in the military and becoming increasingly disaffected. Your
troops fighting against the infinitely more competent and determined Ukrainian
armed forces are already severely demoralized. The new “recruits” are not eager
to become cannon fodder. Your own elites are becoming even more frustrated and
disgusted with you – notably the security forces and the military. It does not
help that you are trying to play strategic military genius and personally
direct them on the battlefield.
And then there are the referendums in the occupied
territories – a vote at gunpoint. Everyone knows they are a sham, a farce, a
fraud – yet another among countless Russian violations of democratic norms and
principles. Oh, and by the way, nobody is going to recognize annexed Ukrainian
lands, nor buy your claims that you are now defending Russian territory. That
would be laughable if it weren’t so warped.
So, what is to be done (chto delat’), to use Lenin’s
famous phrase? The other famous phrase is who is to blame (kto vinovat) and you
should be able to figure that out, just look into the mirror. Well, first, when
it comes to your nuclear saber-rattling, which poses an even greater threat to
global peace and stability than the considerable damage that you have already
done, heed the warnings you have been receiving privately from U.S. officials,
and the words of President Joe Biden: “don’t, don’t, don’t!”
The other thing you can do is to get the hell out of
Ukraine. Just leave. End the war. Period. Full stop. Granted, the chances of
that are just about nil, so I am not holding my breath. But it is an option,
perhaps the least bad option for you. Think about it.
One way or another, sooner or later, you will be
defeated. Either you will leave, or the Ukrainians will kick you out. After
all, they are defending their land and that gives them the kind of motivation
that your occupying forces will never have. They realize that as long as Russia
rules even a meter of Ukrainian land, there will never be any respect for life,
dignity, human rights and freedoms for any subjugated Ukrainian.
Because of your evil, your stupidity and your lunacy,
Russia has become a global pariah. You stand on the wrong side of history and
may very well become the destroyer, not the savior, of Russia.
Nobody knows what fate awaits you – I personally
would love to see you face justice at the International Criminal Court in the
Hague – but it could be even worse than that. What happened to Italian Fascist
dictator Benito Mussolini in 1945 or Romanian dictator Nicolae Ceausescu in
December of 1989 comes to mind. Sweet dreams, Vova.
Sincerely,
Orest S. Deychakiwsky
P.S. I was tempted to write a letter akin to what
the Zaporizhian Kozaks wrote to the Turkish Sultan, but I am not that creative,
and, besides, this is a family newspaper.
AUGUST 26, 2022 2:24 PM
Belarus and Russia’s War on Ukraine
by Orest Deychakiwsky
In thinking about Russia’s war against Ukraine, it is
a mistake to equate the Belarusian people with the country’s long-time
dictator, Alyaksandr Lukashenka. And it is important to recall the
unprecedented eruption of massive Belarusian pro-democracy demonstrations that
began two years ago.
No doubt, Belarus’ illegitimate leader is Russian
President Vladimir Putin’s accomplice in the war that has wreaked so much death
and destruction. Belarus is a co-aggressor state. Its armed forces are not
themselves fighting in Ukraine, although, unfortunately, Russia has reportedly
recruited thousands of Belarusian volunteers to fight on its side, most of whom
are doing it for money rather than out of conviction.
Belarus was a staging ground for Russian forces to
invade Ukraine in the early phase of the war, providing the shortest land route
to attack Kyiv.
The Russian military continues to use Belarusian
territory to attack Ukraine. Recent satellite images indicate an increasing
number of flights from Russia to Belarusian airfields with equipment that could
be used in air-raids. Given Belarus’ proximity to Kyiv and western Ukraine,
through which a great deal of Western aid flows, this poses a serious threat.
But don’t conflate the people of Belarus with the
Lukashenka regime.
According to surveys, Belarusians are largely opposed
to the war, with only a tiny fraction supporting Belarus’ direct involvement in
Ukraine. They want nothing to do with it, and those polls show they are
convinced that the war will only have negative consequences for their own
country.
Indeed, many Belarusians are actively supporting
Ukraine, risking their well-being and lives. Some 1,500 Belarusian volunteers
are fighting alongside the Ukrainian military. They include the Belarusian
Regiment of Kastus Kalinouski – named after a 19th century Belarusian writer
and revolutionary who led an 1863 uprising against the Russian Empire.
The fighters fully realize that by backing Ukraine
they are also ultimately defending their own country’s freedom and
independence. Their ranks are growing.
Other Belarusians have actively opposed the war from
within Belarus, notably the so-called “railway partisans.” These Belarusian
patriots disabled or disrupted railway links in Belarus, stalling the movement
of Russian troops and military supplies into Ukraine. Some have recently
received harsh sentences. Other Belarusians provided valuable military
information. These actions no doubt complicated the Russian assault on Kyiv.
The democratic opposition, led by Svitlana
Tsikhanouskaya, the true winner of the fraudulent August 2020 presidential
elections, is firmly on the side of Ukraine, recognizing that the fates of
Belarus and Ukraine are inextricably linked. On August 9, the second
anniversary of the elections, the Belarusian opposition formed the United
Transition Government – in effect, a government-in-exile – with the goals of an
independent, sovereign and democratic Belarus. A key task is to mobilize and
increase support for Ukraine.
Many Belarusians feel a close kinship with
Ukrainians. The two peoples have a shared history. Both trace their heritage to
Kyivan Rus’. Both have far greater legitimate claim to this ancient polity than
does Russia, despite warped Russian attempts to appropriate its history.
Belarus and much of Ukraine were part of the Grand
Duchy of Lithuania and later the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth. The (Old)
Ruthenian language, predecessor to modern Ukrainian and Belarusian, was an
official language. Both peoples have far more in common linguistically,
culturally and historically with each other than they do with Russia. With the
expansion of the Tsarist empire into both countries in the 1700s came centuries
of repression and Russification, which continued under brutal Soviet rule. The
late-1930s killing fields in Bykivnia near Kyiv and Kurapaty near Minsk are
powerful symbols of Moscow’s efforts to destroy the “enemies of the people” in
both countries. Belarusians – certainly Mr. Lukashenka’s many opponents –
realize that Russia is a common enemy to both Belarus and Ukraine.
Since becoming independent in 1991, Ukraine and
Belarus have gone on separate tracks. Ukraine is a democratic, pluralistic
country where basic rights and freedoms are respected, while Belarus, except
for the first three years following independence, became a repressive
dictatorship following the election of Mr. Lukashenka as president in 1994.
Every single election under the dictator’s rule has
been fraudulent – something I personally witnessed, having observed all but one
national election during my tenure at the U.S. Helsinki Commission. The one I
missed was because the Belarusian government denied me a visa because of my
involvement with Congressional legislation sanctioning the regime and providing
assistance to the beleaguered democratic opposition and civil society.
Post-election protests – and subsequent crackdowns,
notably, the brutal post-2010 election crackdown – have been commonplace
throughout Mr. Lukashenka’s rule. None of the protests, however, ever
approached the scale and perseverance of those held following the August 9,
2020, presidential election.
The vote fraud in that election was so flagrant that
most Belarusians were convinced that the real winner was Ms. Tsikhanouskaya.
The democratic world recognizes that she represents the Belarusian people, and
she has been warmly received at the highest levels in the United States and
much of Europe.
Mass unprecedented peaceful rallies, occasionally
exceeding 100,000 people, lasted for months, despite the torture, abductions
and detentions of thousands of people. Ultimately, the protestors were no match
for a system that had long honed its repressive machine. In the two years
since, the Lukashenka regime has continued and even intensified its crackdown
on civil society activists, independent media and other dissenting voices –
including those who have opposed the war Ukraine. Today, more than 1,200
political prisoners languish in Belarusian prisons.
Despite his ostensible fealty to Russia, even Mr.
Lukashenka has long resisted efforts to be absorbed by Russia because doing so
would mean a loss of his own hold on power. He and Putin reportedly cannot
stand each other. But thanks to the lack of political and economic reforms
throughout his 27-year rule, he has made Belarus vulnerable to Russia. For
this, he has nobody to blame but himself. Mr. Lukashenka is in a trap of his
own making. This dependency has only grown in the last two years. Indeed, if it
weren’t for Putin’s backing, the Belarusian autocrat would likely have lost his
grip on power following the 2020 mass protests.
Thus far, Mr. Lukashenka has resisted Putin’s
considerable pressure to overtly join the invasion of Ukraine. He well
understands that the Belarusian people oppose it, and that his own military –
especially the rank-and-file – have no desire to get involved. Given his own
lack of legitimacy among Belarusians and the considerable, even if now largely
suppressed or exiled opposition, Mr. Lukashenka sees the potential threat to
his own rule should Belarus decide to more extensively participate in the war.
It is vital that Ukrainians and their friends and
allies in the West make the distinction between the Lukashenka regime and the
long-suffering Belarusian people who seek a free and democratic future. The
Ukrainian government needs to embrace Belarus’ legitimate, democratic
opposition which knows that a Russian defeat in Ukraine will mean liberation
from the tyrannical Lukashenka regime and bring the Belarusian people closer to
freedom at home.
The United States and its Western partners must
continue to stand with the people of Belarus. The West imposed stricter
sanctions following the 2020 election and massive crackdown, and further
expanded sanctions for its role in Russia’s invasion. The West needs to
continue its assistance to those seeking democratic change in Belarus and to
those who defend its sovereignty. Both Ukraine and the West need to cooperate
with the Tsikhanouskaya-led United Transition Government as much as possible.
The Belarusian people are Ukraine’s natural allies in
the fight against Russian imperialism. It is they who represent the future of
Belarus, not Putin’s puppet, Mr. Lukashenka. Supporting the Belarusian people’s
fight for freedom is the smart thing to do, and the right thing to do.
JULY 15, 2022 1:56 PM
Kherson on my mind and in my dreams
by Orest Deychakiwsky
Three years ago this month, on July 19-22, 2019, I
was in the southern Ukrainian port city of Kherson as an international observer
to the Verkhovna Rada elections. Throughout my career at the U.S. Helsinki
Commission, I had often visited Ukraine – including as an international
observer to every national election but one since 1990. Yet I had never made it
to Kherson until 2019.
For most visitors to Ukraine, Kherson was somewhat
off the beaten path. I certainly had not known much about the city, or Kherson
Oblast, considered to be the “fruit basket of Ukraine.” I was pleasantly
surprised at how much the city and region appealed to me. I liked its physical
appearance, the architecture, the wonderful outdoor market.
I liked the people – they were calm and friendly.
Pro-Russian sentiment was nil. They were unmistakably Ukrainian in their
identity and loyalties, despite being largely Russian speaking out of habit.
When I addressed them in Ukrainian, they would invariably switch – and their
Ukrainian was beautiful. While never a hotbed of Ukrainian nationalism for
various historical reasons, I learned that the Organization of Ukrainian
Nationalists (OUN) operated an underground cell in Kherson during World War II
resisting, from August 1941 to March 1944, the German occupiers, then
afterwards, the Soviets. Indeed, one of the OUN leaders in the Kherson district
was Mykola Bandera, brother of OUN leader Stepan Bandera.
One of my fondest moments during my brief stay in
Kherson – a reprieve from our intensive elections-related schedule – was taking
a boating trip down the widening Dnipro as it approaches the Black Sea and
swimming in its refreshing waters on a picture-perfect warm sunny day. I have
been to many places and experienced much in my life, but for some strange,
intangible reason, that experience stands out.
Three years later, I find myself often thinking about
Kherson, now suffering due to Russia’s brutal war on Ukraine. Russian forces
have been occupying the city – and much of the oblast early in the war and have
been terrorizing its people since. Kherson is the only oblast center captured
by the Russian forces since the start of the all-out invasion. Kherson Oblast,
which borders Crimea, is of critical strategic importance, vital to Moscow’s
ability to control access to the peninsula and to potentially holding Ukraine’s
Black Sea coast.
As they have elsewhere in Ukraine, the Russians
invaders have shown their true colors in Kherson, exposing themselves for the
savages that they are. Ambassador Michael Carpenter, in a recent speech to
representatives of the 57 countries of the Organization for Security and
Cooperation in Europe (OSCE), put it succinctly: “The Kremlin’s pre-planned,
multi-faceted campaign to absorb Kherson lays bare the truth of its vision of a
subjugated, Russified Ukraine. Kherson is the Kremlin’s laboratory of horrors.”
The Russian occupiers are responsible for numerous
egregious human rights abuses, including killings, kidnappings, torture and
sexual violence.
Local civilians are rounded up in “filtration points”
and interrogated for any connections to the Ukrainian government or independent
media outlets. Russian occupiers have reportedly detained some 600 people in
the region – local officials, civil society activists, journalists – in what
have been described as “torture chambers.” Some cite higher numbers of
“disappeared.” Many of the detained are horribly mistreated. Graphic accounts
of torture by survivors are nothing short of chilling.
Residents are beaten in their homes or on the streets
and subjected to humiliating identity checks, and God forbid if you have
Ukrainian symbols tattooed on your body or if your iPhone has anything
perceived as pro-Ukrainian on it.
Many Khersonites are being forcibly deported to
Russia. The puppet authorities are reportedly settling all those whom they
consider to be loyal Russian citizens into the homes of those forcibly
deported.
Russian soldiers have looted shops and stolen
property. Prices have skyrocketed. Supplies are short. Medicines can only be
bought on the streets. Many people have lost their jobs. The hryvnia is being
replaced by the ruble and internet services and Ukrainian mobile phone
providers have been cut off.
It is little wonder that more than half of the city’s
residents have left, according to some estimates.
The Russians are taking active measures to bring
Kherson under their administrative control, detaining the Ukrainian mayor,
destroying its democratic Ukrainian governing structures and replacing them
with their puppets and proxies. Free Ukrainian media have been supplanted by
Russian propaganda. There is a wholesale attempt to Russify and isolate the
population. And Moscow seems to be gearing up for a referendum to annex Kherson
to Russia, possibly in September.
We see “passportization,” with Russian President
Vladimir Putin issuing a decree expediting the process for Kherson residents to
receive Russian citizenship. Given the reluctance of inmates, the Russians were
forcing passports on people at a correctional colony in Kherson. Other
residents have been told that they could not get pensions or start a business
unless they obtain a Russian passport. Oh, and children in Kherson Oblast born
after February 24 are automatically made Russian citizens.
Ukrainian state symbols have been removed. Gone are
the large banners I saw three years ago on the municipal building that
proclaimed, “Kherson is Ukraine,” and, in Ukrainian, “Glory to Ukraine” and
“Glory to its heroes.” A Russian curriculum is being introduced in schools –
you can bet that it will present a highly distorted view of Ukrainian history
and culture. The use of the Ukrainian language is discouraged; there are plans
to ban the circulation of documents in the Ukrainian language. A leader in the
so-called Kherson “military-civil administration” recently said that education
in schools and institutions of higher education will be conducted in Russian
but offered that Ukrainian language classes can be formed if parents so
request. How generous of him.
As much as the story of Kherson is one of brute
repression and Russification, it is also one of remarkable courage and
resistance.
Despite the cruelty and climate of fear that pervades
it, the people of Kherson city and oblast refuse to be cowed. We see resistance
and partisan activity take many different forms, ranging from killings of
pro-Russian figures and acts of sabotage to the refusal of average citizens to
cooperate with the Russians, including educators and health-care workers.
Initially, we saw pro-Ukrainian street protests, but these have been quashed.
Several attempts to organize referendums on joining Russia have not taken hold
due to the refusal of citizens to cooperate. The resistance of the population
and growing insurgency is mounting a strong challenge to Russian attempts to
consolidate their control.
Most Khersonites are resisting obtaining Russian
passports, despite pressure, or, reportedly, even monetary incentives to do so.
Ukrainian flags and pro-Ukrainian symbols, graffiti and leaflets appear in the
city. Partisans release videos calling on the occupying Russians to save their
own lives and leave. Indeed, partisans have helped the Ukrainian military
target Russian forces. In May, the puppet Kherson governor appeared at a
meeting with teachers in a bullet proof vest. That was probably a smart move on
his part, as Kremlin-approved local leaders and Russian soldiers have been
attacked and killed with increasing frequency in shootings and car bombs.
Ukrainian fighters have been carrying out
counterattacks in Kherson Oblast, slowly regaining control. They are getting
close to the city and may be readying for a counteroffensive to liberate the
suffering and terrorized inhabitants of the city and region which is so key to
the strategic stability of Ukraine. The growing supply of weapons that the U.S.
and its allies are providing will help in achieving this goal.
My dream is that I will someday once again visit a
liberated, free, Ukrainian Kherson, take a boat ride down the Dnipro and swim
in its cool waters where I did so on that sunny summer day three years ago, a
special place where the Dnipro and two of its tributaries, Stare Dnipro and
Kosheva, meet. May someday soon the sun cast the warm rays of freedom, peace,
justice and truth upon Kherson and all of Ukraine.